"Alarming: The Moral Ecology of Time"
Jim Farrell
Sunday, November 10th, 2002

As far as Biblical scholars can tell, there were no alarm clocks in the Garden of Eden. Perhaps that's why it was paradise. There was morning and evening of the seven days of creation, but no clocks. And in the gospel for today, which is not one of my favorites, there seem to have been no watches either. I get the point of today's gospel--I know it's good to be prepared--but I always think that if the bridegroom wanted the lamps lit when he arrived, he should have been on time--or he should have called ahead. And the women with the lamps should have formed a union, so they'd get overtime pay while they waited. So I'd like to go a different direction with this gospel. I'd like to consider the final line--"You do not know the day or the hour"--and think about how Americans tell time. Today I'd like to take a few minutes to talk about the moral ecology of time. I'd like to ask, "What time is it, really, when the alarm clock goes off? And what do we do with the time of our lives?"

To answer this last question, sociologists use time diaries, which show that that Americans use about ten and a half hours each day taking care of bodily needs like eating, sleeping, and personal care, and about eight minutes on religion. We spend seven and a half hours at work, and a half hour on child care. This leaves six hours of discretionary time. We use two hours watching TV, and 12 minutes studying. We spend an hour and a half in casual social interaction, 30 minutes in resting or miscellaneous leisure, and 6 minutes in voluntary organizations. The time we spend tells us a lot about what we value. When we say we don't have time to do something, what we really mean is that we haven't made time--individually or culturally--for it. If we really thought that religion was as important as TV, we would figure out a way to devote two hours a day to it. But, culturally speaking, it's not as important, so we don't.

Most Americans are obsessed by time, as our language suggests. Some of us are saving time, others are spending it. Some of us are marking time, and some of us are actually killing it. We have prime time in the evenings, and free time on the weekends--which suggests that we have "slave time" most of the week. Many of us even feel like we're doing time, caught in a prison of our own cultural contrivance.

Past Time

An alarm clock tells us the time, or more precisely, it tells us one social construction of time. It tells us to get up, and get to work on time. But in focusing our attention on one dimension of time, it also helps us to forget other important times of our lives. The clock tells us about today, for example, but it doesn't connect today to yesterday or tomorrow. Yesterday, the clock presumes, is just history, and tomorrow is science fiction.

Too often, we believe, as the old song has it, "That was yesterday, and yesterday's gone." But I'd like to suggest that yesterday's not gone. Dead people still rule our lives. Almost all of the ideas and institutions we inhabit today are the creations of dead people. The words I'm speaking were invented by dead people. We are the incarnation of the past, and therefore we are responsible to it.

Wendell Berry's poem "At a Country Funeral" is a lovely reminder of the potency of the past in our lives. A farmer has died, and Berry describes the funeral:

Now the old dead wait in the open coffin
for the blood kin to gather, come home
for one last time, to hear old men
whose tongues bear an essential topography
speak memories doomed to die.
But our memory of ourselves, hard earned,
is one of the land's seeds, as a seed
is the memory of the life of its kind in its place,
to pass on into life the knowledge
of what has died. What we owe the future
is not a new start, for we can only begin
with what has happened. We owe the future
the past, the long knowledge
that is the potency of time to come.
That makes a man's grave a rich furrow.
As this suggests, we have a relationship with the people of the past, and an obligation to the dead people who have showed us what's really good in a good society. Even when we are not visiting the cemetery, we are walking among dead people. When we go to a peace rally, for example, we're walking with our friends, but we're also walking with the people of the past who taught us a passion for justice and the purposes of protest. If you look at the pictures of the march in the hallway, you'll see people from Joan of Arc, but you'll also see Henry Thoreau and Dorothy Day, Martin Luther King and Cesar Chavez and Harvey Egan. Our memory of these good people is the seed of our own good behavior. The past is only past if we refuse to re-member it, if we refuse to honor the traditions we have received.

Future Time

If it's alarming that my alarm clock keeps me from the past, it is also alarming that it keeps me from the future. We all make some personal preparations for the future. But we don't have many collective plans for the future. In political campaigns like the one just completed, I'm always amazed by our inability to imagine a society of genuine peace and justice. And I'm convinced that the poverty of our imagination of the future accounts for the very real poverty or our lives, even for those of us who are wealthy. Americans tend not to be very mindful of future generations, and when we are, we often ask, in effect, "What has the future ever done for me?" A popular bumper sticker boasts "I'm spending my children's inheritance." And so we perpetrate a kind of structural violence on the long-unborn that we often don't even see. This conception of the future also appears in our cultural neglect of children, who are the poorest of Americans.

We don't think much about the future as something that we create today, both by our activity and our inactivity. We don't usually think that we are literally making history with every one of our everyday actions. And as a result, the future that we are creating is not one that many of us would want to live in. But we are tomorrow's dead people. We are the future in its present incarnation. We're the last best hope of future generations. What we do today creates and reinforces the institutions of tomorrow. When we come to St. Joan of Arc on Sunday, we strengthen a community with a particular vision of the future. When we go golfing instead, we contribute to an alternative future. When we go to a peace rally, we create a future that has more possibilities for peace. And we create a future that has a powerful peace rally as part of its usable past. But when we watch mindless TV instead, we create a future with more commercials and commercialism, reinforcing images of people and society that often contradict our deepest values. When the alarm wakes us up in the morning, it calls us not just to the work of the day, but to the work of the days to come as well.

Nature's Time

But even if our alarm clocks could locate us in a stream of historical continuity, they still would not necessarily connect us to biological or ecological time. The clock tells the story of human time, but it's silent about nature's time, about the long cycles of prairies and forests and oceans. While natural rhythms are essentially cyclical, Americans generally believe in a more linear construction of time. We believe in progress, which is basically improvement over time. But in nature's time, it's progress when the sun comes up each morning, and progress again when Spring sprouts every year. And in nature's time, efficiency isn't measured by speed, but by sustainability and regeneration--the ability to maintain the extravagant generosity of life. So when human life causes natural extinctions, when our lives threatens the biosphere, it's literally a way of killing time for other species.

In nature's time, minutes and seconds don't mean much. As a measure of biological time, therefore, we might take the amount of time it takes to make an inch of topsoil, roughly five hundred years. And we might consider that when we live in a way that depletes soil faster than that, we are not "on time," no matter how fast or productive we might be.

God's Time

In her poem "The Summer Day," Mary Oliver asks "Who made the world?/Who made the swan and the black bear?/Who made the grasshopper?" The answer to these questions should affect our conceptions of time. If the answer is "Nobody" or "random physical forces," then time is just a human invention. We can spend time, and waste time, and kill time, and it doesn't matter. But if the Creation is the work of a Creator, then time is God's gift, and our time is not just ours, but God's. If time is not just secular but sacred, then the time of our lives isn't finite, but infinite. And Thoreau was right in observing that you can't kill time without injuring eternity.

In earlier Christian cultures, people told God's time with the Angelus bells, which provided a religious frame for the day by calling people to prayer every evening. [The word "clock," in fact, comes from the French word "cloche," meaning "bell."] Americans still ritualize the idea of God's time with a day known as the Sabbath. The Sabbath used to be a sacred time, a time when Christians considered how to "redeem the time"--how to make ordinary time extraordinary, luminous with possibilities for good. With the Sabbath, people made time to listen to the sacred, and to apply the wisdom of holiness to their everyday lives. Although many religious Americans still attend church services on Sunday--and here we are--we often lack that earlier sense of sacred time, with its promise of changing the world.

If we ever set our clocks to God's time, if we ever woke up to God's extravagant gift of time, we might need to spend our days differently. An awareness of God's time, for example, might cause us to challenge human notions of progress, as Martin Luther King did. In his magnificent epistle, the "Letter from Birmingham Jail," he argued against "the strangely irrational notion that there is something in the flow of time that will inevitably cure all ills. Actually," he insisted, in a passage that seems especially relevant this week, "time itself is neutral; it can be used either destructively or constructively. More and more I feel that the people of ill will have used time much more effectively than the people of good will. We will have to repent in this generation not merely for the hateful words and actions of the bad people but for the appalling silence of the good people. Human progress never rolls in on wheels of inevitability; it comes through the tireless efforts of [people] willing to be co-workers with God, and without this hard work, time itself becomes an ally of the forces of social stagnation."

Conclusion

So how might we respond to the alarms sounding in our lives? First, we might learn to tell time. We might make a practice of putting clock time in its place, reminding ourselves that we also exist in past time and future time, in God's time and nature's time. We might devise rituals and reminders that would help us maintain that complex consciousness of time. This Mass is just such a ritual. It connects memory and hope by linking our religious traditions to our dreams of the future. It reminds us that we are, in God's time and in God's creation, stewards of nature. And it calls us to vocation--in every aspect of our lives--to create the Kingdom of God right here, right now.

Secondly, we might try to redeem the time. When the alarm goes off in the morning, what time is it? According to Martin Luther King, it's time to be co-workers with God. So we need to think about how we spend our time, and to consider whether the time of our lives reflects the times--past and present, natural and sacred--that make life meaningful for us. When the alarm goes off in the morning, we might try to come up with a good answer to Mary Oliver's provocative question: "What is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life?"

To redeem the time, we might practice a new form of time management. Instead of cramming as many activities as possible into our days, we might try to schedule some redemptive activities. And these redemptive activities don't need to be big. Recently one of my former students wrote me a beautiful letter about his struggle to find the good work that is the mark of vocation. In it, he observed that "We are made in our small moments. In fact, `now' is all we have, so we should do our best to be good during the smaller moments. It is a form of practice for the rest." Too, often we identify with our major moments, and forget that we can redeem the time with actions as small as a kiss or a caress, as seemingly insignificant as a conversation. Sometimes, just by listening, we create "free spaces" where good people can find support for good thinking and good work. At St. Olaf, I meet regularly with one of my friends because we have become what Julie Madden calls "hoping mechanisms" for each other. In our conversations, we help each other focus on having a good time--which is to say, a time in which we are good.

In addition to telling time and redeeming time, we might also try to reform the time. We live in a culture that trivializes time, a culture that defines "prime time" by its peculiar tele-vision of the world. We live in a culture that systematically creates a "time bind" for people by trapping them in "long-hour jobs" that often leave just minutes for the real work of creation. We live in a culture that consumes our time with demeaning work and consumption, assuring us that a few minutes of "quality time" is an adequate compensation for long hours of "quantity time." In this social construction of time, the clock often works against our fully human being. And yet we have no politics of time. The Republicans tell us that Iraq is the issue, and the Democrats tell us that "It's the economy, stupid,"--and we, playing the part of Stupid, stupidly believe them. But it's not just the war or the economy--it's the larger economy of time. It's the moral ecology of everyday life. And it's our institutions. Catholic Worker Peter Maurin once said that institutions should be designed to make it easier for people to be good. We have some institutions like that--and St. Joan's in one of them. But we don't yet have enough of them. So it's probably time to make time to get them.

Will we ever really learn to tell time? Can we make time to redeem the time? The answer, of course, is that only time will tell.


If this print button does not work(older browsers), right mouse click anywhere in the window and print.

An audio version of this homily is available for 4 weeks on our
highlights page.