
| Death Penalty Forum ... a biased viewpoint February 10th, 2004 |
I was motivated to attend this event by the strong feelings I have on the topic which were reinforced when I met Sr. Helen Prejean, the author of "Dead Man Walking", some years ago. My slant on the topic can be found in the letters on the sidebar to this article. I tried to use arguments the reader might appreciate, but received only a canned response from the governor and was ignored by Representative Hackbarth. I did get a nice response from my state representative who shares my views. Is it clear this is not an unbiased report?
A reception preceded the formal program at the forum. A buffet table of meats, cheeses, fruit, coffee and punch was provided. There was plenty of literature on hand and buttons and shirts for sale. A crowd of several hundred assembled. Many were students. About half a dozen state legislators and quite a few attorneys were among them. There was also a surprise appearance of Archbishop Flynn who said he found the death penalty one of the most abhorrent things he could imagine. He also stated "violence reaps more violence". He was happy to see such a large crowd and thanked us for our interest in this vital issue.
She mentioned the history of capital punishment in Minnesota, which has led up to the recent introduction of State House of Representatives bill #1602, and its Senate companion #1860. Details on these can be found on the Minnesota State Legislature website.
Kate mentioned a number of statistics and arguments against the death penalty including the following:
Bud was filled with rage after Julie's murder and for the first month, only wanted to see her killer fry. He self medicated his pain with alcohol, and his drinking steadily increased until about a year later when he found healing in the ability to forgive the killers, Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols.
Bud also talked about his meeting with the man he described as a "bigger victim" of the bombing: Timothy's father, Bill McVeigh, who has to live with not only the loss of his son, but also awareness of the suffering his son brought to so many others.
Bud called Timothy's execution “a staged political event”. He has spoken with people close to nearly all the bombing victims and said there wasn't a single one of them that felt better as a result of the execution. Several told him it didn't have the affect they expected.
Gary cited the history of capital punishment in America and gave numerous examples of how unjust actions of law enforcement and criminal justice personnel have contributed to wrongful incarceration and death sentencing. He even gave several examples of recent unjust executions that debunk the myth that no innocent person is executed in this country. He said there are likely many more, but detective work on a criminal case usually ends with execution.
In Gary's own case, the police report stated that he "showed no emotion" at the crime scene, and this was frequently cited in his trial. He said this was because he was in emotional shock and was trying to be as helpful as he could. Another claim that he had failed a polygraph test turned out to be merely a flat line due to fatigue. He counted about 150 lies during the prosecution of his case and said the policemen responsible for most of them have since been promoted. The only real evidence against him was a jailhouse snitch - who also lied. A Northwestern University professor eventually went to bat for him and obtained a taped confession from the real killers in the fall of 1995. Despite this, Gary wasn't released until October, 1996.
Gary mentioned his concern about the easy availability of handguns and said we need to "eliminate the immediate opportunity" for criminals as well as eliminating the sources of frustration that lead to drug abuse and crime. He also said that when a prisoner is executed, everyone on death row experiences a sense of depression - even the guards!
When asked about his loss of opportunity to mourn the loss of his parents, Gary said he still hasn't gotten over it, and experiences occasional bouts of anxiety.
Bud's response to a question about the current attempt to bring the issue to the voters in Minnesota was that this might be a way the governor could "wipe the blood off his hands". I suspect that it's more an attempt to have the matter decided by people who are less informed than those in the legislature and who are apt to base their choice on emotions more-so than intellect.
Jan Schultz, a public defender, gave the closing remarks, which were mostly an appeal for support for MNADP. She said that even if the death penalty legislation doesn't pass in this session, it is a "gathering and imminent threat". Gee, where have we heard those words before? This time, I suspect they're for real.

Governor Pawlenty's recent attempt to reinstate capital punishment has met up with significant opposition, which included the community forum I attended Tuesday evening, Feb. 10, at the Brady Education Center at the University of St. Thomas.
I think this is an issue of special relevance to us at St. Joan's because it's one topic in which the progressive views most of us share, are perfectly aligned with those of the Vatican. The church's position merited a good deal of discussion in a recent edition of the Catholic Spirit, which also ran an article previewing the forum. Mainstream media publicity included a recent column by Doug Grow in the Minneapolis Star Tribune.
Kate Krisik, the Social Concerns Director of the Minnesota Catholic Conference, kicked off the program. She acknowledged some of the organizers and invited us to join members and supporters of Minnesotans Against the Death Penalty (MNADP) for a rally and lobby day at noon, February 26, 2004 at the Minnesota State Capitol Rotunda. More information on that can be obtained by calling 612-978-1936.

Kate Krisik
The first guest speaker was Bud Welch, whose 24-year-old daughter, Julie, was killed in the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. He spoke at length about Julie, her formative years, and her passion for learning foreign languages, which led to her profession as a translator. Her body was found alongside the litigants she was translating for on the day of the bombing.

Bud Welch
The second speaker, Gary Gauger, was convicted in 1994 of the 1993 murders of his parents and sentenced to death. It was later proven that the murders were actually done by members of a motorcycle gang who he said are infamous for "random acts of violence to raise money to support a criminal enterprise".

Gary Gauger
The speeches were followed by a question and answer session.
![]() and ![]() |
![]() |
| Dear Rep. Hackbarth, In your letter to the Star Tribune today, the only thing you said in favor of your promotion of the death penalty was that it would send "a message to those who are truly ritualistic killers". I'm sure you're aware that studies have consistently shown that the death penalty has no deterrent effect. Clearly no such message is getting through, and your assertion that it would happen here in Minnesota isn't supported by the facts. It should also be clear that the death penalty does nothing to ease the pain and suffering of victims and their loved ones. It costs more to administer the death penalty than life imprisonment even for youthful offenders, so taxpayers will have to bear a much greater burden for something that has no positive value if the death penalty is adopted here. It is ironic that the kidnapping of Dru Sjodin sparked interest in the death penalty. It would have done nothing to prevent that crime since her accused kidnapper would not have warranted it previously, or even currently under the strict guidelines proposed by Governor Pawlenty. If you want to do something positive about crime, please consider toughening life sentencing so that citizens will be protected from the most dangerous criminals for whom there is no hope for rehabilitation. Please don't waste our tax money on something that won't do any good for anyone.
Kind regards, | Dear Gov. Pawlenty,
As I mentioned to your campaign solicitor who called me last weekend, if you proceed to bring this barbaric form of punishment back into our fine state, you'll have to do it entirely without my support. It is particularly troubling to me that someone who purports to share my Christian faith could favor something that is clearly nothing but an expression of hatred and revenge. This is the antithesis of what I stand for and there should be no room for it in any civilized state. If there is anyone who can appreciate the ability of a human being to change, it should be a born-again Christian. If there is anyone who can appreciate how wrong it is for any person or state to irrevocably deny another soul that right to change, it should be a born-again Christian. How ironic it is that those same self-righteous souls who claim to have received God's grace are the ones most willing to deny it to another. I'm sure you're aware of the wealth of evidence showing the death penalty has no effect as a deterrant, and that victims and their loved ones receive no real comfort from it. I assume you're also aware that the financial burden to the state is greater than prosecution of life imprisonment. It should be clear that there's nothing to be gained from this and a great deal to lose including, for many of us, our self respect. I hope you'll reconsider your stand and actions on this issue.
Kind regards, |